Skip to main content

Evaluating global listed infrastructure indices

Co-Founder and Managing Director, Global Listed Infrastructure

by Andrew Maple-Brown

Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

Steven Kempler | Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

by Steven Kempler

Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

Research paper 1 Jun 2015
Electricity towers at sunset

Interested in investing with us?

The purpose of this paper is to update the detailed analysis of the major global listed infrastructure indices we conducted in 2013. This follows the release of two new global listed infrastructure indices, by both FTSE and MSCI, and the decommissioning of the UBS infrastructure index series. The focus of this paper is on whether the indices truly capture the infrastructure characteristics many investors are looking for, including low cashflow volatility from long lived assets, inflation protection, and portfolio diversification benefits.

We have again weighed the strengths and weaknesses of these indices against the most common alternative benchmark, being an inflation plus target.

Two years on, the analysis again highlights the significant divergence with regards to the infrastructure ‘purity’ of the indices, their historical volatilities, and their correlations to global equities. There were also considerable differences with regards to the degree of subjectiveness within the index construction processes. However, all the indices we analysed demonstrated relatively weak linkage to inflation, to differing degrees, as compared to typical investor expectations of the asset class.

We believe an infrastructure manager should be focussed on delivering results across the key characteristics of the asset class such as low cashflow volatility, inflation protection and portfolio diversification. Index choice therefore remains an important consideration for investors.

From our review of the indices, we conclude that the new FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index is now the most superior infrastructure index available. It scores strongly across our qualitative assessments of infrastructure purity and historical volatility, correlation and beta. It is as strong as any other infrastructure index from an inflation linkage perspective, and we rate its index construction highly based on its transparent and robust methodology. For investors who would prefer to use an index as their benchmark we would therefore recommend the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index.

It is the lack of focus on the inflation linkage aspect of all infrastructure indices, which is understandable due to the complexity involved in evaluating this factor, remains a weakness of the infrastructure indices generally, including the new FTSE Index. Our view is inflation linkage is one of the key characteristics of the asset class, and so should be focussed on throughout the investment process. For this reason we believe that an “Inflation plus” benchmark continues to best align managers with the investment objectives of the asset class.

Notwithstanding this, we are very supportive of the development of the new FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index and expect it to play an important role in the industry going forward. We will adopt it for a number of client reporting functions; such as communicating our investment style with investors, discussing portfolio positioning, considering current portfolio risks, evaluating shorter-term performance, and conducting attribution analysis.

Andrew Maple-Brown
Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

Co-Founder and Managing Director, Global Listed Infrastructure
Co-Founder and Managing Director, Global Listed Infrastructure

Andrew Maple-Brown

BEng, BCom, MAppFin, CIM
Andrew joined Maple-Brown Abbott in 2012. Andrew is the Managing Director of Maple-Brown Abbott Global Listed Infrastructure which he started with his partners in 2012. Before joining Maple-Brown Abbott he spent eleven years working for Macquarie Group, the remaining five years of which he spent as a Portfolio Manager within their Global Listed Infrastructure team, working in Sydney and New York. Andrew has more than twenty years of experience in financing and investing in infrastructure assets and securities. In addition to being a portfolio manager for the strategy, he is also responsible for coverage of Regulated Utilities across North America. Andrew began his career at Lend Lease and was there for five years.

 

Board and committee membership:
Maple-Brown Abbott Global Listed Infrastructure Pty Limited Board
Asset Allocation Committee

Andrew

Andrew Maple-Brown
Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

Steven Kempler | Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure
Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

Steven Kempler

BCom, LLB, MFin, CFA
Steven joined Maple-Brown Abbott in 2012 and is co-founder and portfolio manager of global listed infrastructure. Prior to Maple-Brown Abbott, he spent six years in Macquarie’s Global Listed Infrastructure team as an investment analyst covering infrastructure and utilities in the Asia Pacific region. He was later appointed as a joint Portfolio Manager for Macquarie’s Emerging Market Listed Infrastructure strategy.  Prior to joining Macquarie, Steven worked briefly within Rothschild’s investment banking division in London, specifically on debt and mezzanine private placement transactions. Steven is an airports expert and is responsible for the coverage of the team’s airport investments around the globe, the transportation infrastructure and communication infrastructure assets.

 

Board and committee membership:
Maple-Brown Abbott Global Listed Infrastructure Pty Limited

Steven

Interested in investing with us?

Investment Insights

Data Center
Research paper 9 Oct 2024

Data Centers – are they infrastructure?

The Maple-Brown Abbott Global Listed Infrastructure (GLI) team has long held that data center companies do not exhibit the requisite “core” characteristics of infrastructure, namely due to lower barriers to entry, higher competition and typically shorter contract lengths relative to other “core” sectors. We believe data centers offer inadequate inflation protection, higher cash flow volatility, and better align with real estate or "core-plus" infrastructure rather than core infrastructure.
Water treatment plant
Research paper 7 Jun 2021

One asset class?

Listed vs unlisted infrastructure through the lens of UK water utilities. We explore the exciting investment opportunities in the UK listed and unlisted water utilities infrastructure market.
Aerial view of an overpass at night
Research paper 17 Sep 2020

Listed vs unlisted infrastructure

Where do you sit on the debate? This paper challenges the assumption that listed infrastructure and unlisted infrastructure are two separate asset classes by analysing examples of actual assets owned by these two distinct investor classes.
Two level road network
Research paper 16 Jun 2019

The role of infrastructure in a portfolio

We believe that investors seek to benefit from the essential service nature and strong strategic positions of infrastructure assets.

Subscribe to receive Investment Insights