Skip to main content

Infrastructure investing needs a tight definition

Co-Founder and Managing Director, Global Listed Infrastructure

by Andrew Maple-Brown

Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

Research paper 10 Sep 2015
Pipeline through forest

Interested in investing with us?

In an environment of considerable market volatility and inflation risk, investors globally are searching for defensive portfolio solutions. As such, infrastructure investments have gained greater focus in recent years as investors are drawn to the defensive characteristics of the sector. Inflation protection, reduced volatility (relative to broader equity markets), and portfolio diversification benefits are amongst the core tenants of what an infrastructure approach has to offer. But investors face a dilemma: will an expected defensive asset actually deliver these defensive characteristics when required? History has shown that infrastructure assets have demonstrated considerable variances in defensiveness, both in recent years, and most notably during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). Investors’ perception of the performance of listed infrastructure during the GFC was hugely impacted by the investment strategy that they had chosen, or the infrastructure index they may consider as a proxy of the sector’s performance. In the author’s opinion, the reasons for this variance are poorly understood. Moreover, the typical definition of infrastructure continues to broaden within the market today. This paper contends that infrastructure investing requires a tight definition to deliver the defensive attributes that investors are targeting. The most significant factor that impacts the defensiveness of the sector can be found in the very definition itself. It is proposed that core infrastructure investing requires an approach that looks beyond the physical attributes of a security, and instead delves into the commercial frameworks in which the assets operate. Of second most importance is the influence of corporate governance. The variance in returns experienced across the sector is considered, in both recent years and during the GFC. The impact that these two factors – (a) the definition used; and, (b) corporate governance – had on the variance of returns is then analysed. Examples of assets that are commonly referred to as infrastructure (including ports and integrated utilities) are discussed, and examples of corporate governance practices in the sector that are concerning are highlighted. The paper concludes that the definition of infrastructure used by an index (or an investment manager) has a substantial impact on its defensiveness. Further, it is argued that investment managers should select indices consistent with their investment strategy – and so, the choice of infrastructure index for each investment strategy provides a valuable insight into the likely defensiveness of the strategy.

Andrew Maple-Brown
Co-Founder and Portfolio Manager, Global Listed Infrastructure

Co-Founder and Managing Director, Global Listed Infrastructure
Co-Founder and Managing Director, Global Listed Infrastructure

Andrew Maple-Brown

BEng, BCom, MAppFin, CIM
Andrew joined Maple-Brown Abbott in 2012. Andrew is the Managing Director of Maple-Brown Abbott Global Listed Infrastructure which he started with his partners in 2012. Before joining Maple-Brown Abbott he spent eleven years working for Macquarie Group, the remaining five years of which he spent as a Portfolio Manager within their Global Listed Infrastructure team, working in Sydney and New York. Andrew has more than twenty years of experience in financing and investing in infrastructure assets and securities. In addition to being a portfolio manager for the strategy, he is also responsible for coverage of Regulated Utilities across North America. Andrew began his career at Lend Lease and was there for five years.

 

Board and committee membership:
Maple-Brown Abbott Global Listed Infrastructure Pty Limited Board
Asset Allocation Committee

Andrew

Interested in investing with us?

Investment Insights

Data Center
Research paper 9 Oct 2024

Data Centers – are they infrastructure?

The Maple-Brown Abbott Global Listed Infrastructure (GLI) team has long held that data center companies do not exhibit the requisite “core” characteristics of infrastructure, namely due to lower barriers to entry, higher competition and typically shorter contract lengths relative to other “core” sectors. We believe data centers offer inadequate inflation protection, higher cash flow volatility, and better align with real estate or "core-plus" infrastructure rather than core infrastructure.
Water treatment plant
Research paper 7 Jun 2021

One asset class?

Listed vs unlisted infrastructure through the lens of UK water utilities. We explore the exciting investment opportunities in the UK listed and unlisted water utilities infrastructure market.
Aerial view of an overpass at night
Research paper 17 Sep 2020

Listed vs unlisted infrastructure

Where do you sit on the debate? This paper challenges the assumption that listed infrastructure and unlisted infrastructure are two separate asset classes by analysing examples of actual assets owned by these two distinct investor classes.
Two level road network
Research paper 16 Jun 2019

The role of infrastructure in a portfolio

We believe that investors seek to benefit from the essential service nature and strong strategic positions of infrastructure assets.

Subscribe to receive Investment Insights